



Student Recruitment Agency vs AI Platform: Which Model Scales for Modern Enrollment?
Dec 15, 2025
Dec 15, 2025
Summary
With 78% of students enrolling with the first school to respond, the commission-based agency model struggles to scale affordably and handle modern inquiry volumes with the necessary speed.
Agencies excel at high-touch, in-market relationship building, while AI platforms are built to handle repetitive tasks like instant response, lead qualification, and systematic follow-up at a predictable cost.
The most effective strategy is a hybrid model that uses agencies for targeted market entry and deploys an AI platform for universal first response, lead nurturing, and reactivation.
An AI student recruitment platform like Havana augments your team by automating top-of-funnel communication, ensuring no lead is missed and freeing up human advisors to focus on high-intent students.
You've set up your recruitment strategy, spending significant budget on international agencies to drive enrollment. But as your inquiry volume grows, so do your costs. Every new lead, every new market, means more commission fees—with little transparency into what's actually happening in those conversations.
Meanwhile, your competitors are implementing AI platforms that promise to handle unlimited inquiries 24/7, at a fraction of the marginal cost. But you wonder: Can AI really replace the human touch in student recruitment? Or is it just another tech solution that over-promises and under-delivers?
This isn't about replacing humans with robots. It's about making a strategic decision on where to place your budget for maximum leverage, scale, and long-term ROI. Let's break down the real differences between these two approaches to student recruitment.
Why This Comparison Matters More Than Ever
The enrollment landscape has fundamentally changed, making this decision increasingly urgent for institutions:
Response Speed Is No Longer Optional: According to recent research, 78% of prospective students choose to enroll with the first institution that responds to their inquiry. When students can apply to dozens of schools with a few clicks through platforms like The Common App, being first to engage is critical to conversion.
Inquiry Volume Is Overwhelming: The ease of digital applications has created a deluge that exceeds the capacity of most admissions teams. Many institutions report application increases of 30-40% year over year, without corresponding staff increases to manage this volume.
Budget Pressures Are Intense: With dozens of institutions closing in recent years, enrollment efficiency is no longer just about growth—it's about institutional survival. Every dollar spent must demonstrate clear ROI.
Student Expectations Have Shifted: Today's digitally native students expect instant responses across multiple channels (web, SMS, WhatsApp, email). They're comparing your response time not just to other schools, but to every digital experience in their lives.
What Student Recruitment Agencies Do Well
Before weighing alternatives, it's important to acknowledge the legitimate value agencies bring to enrollment strategies:
Market Access & Local Expertise: Agencies provide invaluable on-the-ground knowledge, especially for international recruitment. They understand local educational systems, cultural nuances, and can navigate complex visa processes that are difficult to manage remotely.
Relationship-Driven Outreach: Strong agencies excel at building personal relationships with students, families, and high school counselors. This network effect creates a trust ecosystem that can be difficult to replicate digitally.
High-Touch, Complex Conversations: For programs requiring nuanced explanations or for students with unique circumstances, agencies provide the human guidance that can make the difference in complex decisions.
When Agencies Make the Most Sense: Recruitment agencies are particularly valuable when entering new markets where you have limited brand presence, targeting highly specific student populations, or for programs requiring extensive counseling (like medical schools or specialized graduate programs).
Where Recruitment Agencies Start to Struggle at Scale
Despite their strengths, the traditional agency model encounters significant challenges as institutions aim to grow:
Cost Structures That Punish Volume: Agency fees are typically commission-based, meaning costs rise linearly (or sometimes exponentially) with every enrollment. This model makes scaling expensive and increasingly unpredictable as you grow—the more successful you are, the more you pay.
Limited Visibility Into Conversations: Many institutions describe agency interactions as a "black box." You know leads go in and (hopefully) enrollments come out, but you have limited insight into the conversations happening in between. This prevents you from learning what messaging resonates with prospective students.
Slow Feedback Loops: Many agencies still rely on outdated processes like "spreadsheets and phone calls" for tracking and reporting. As Bullhorn notes, this operational inefficiency creates communication gaps and slows response times—directly contradicting the need for speed in modern recruitment.
Dependency on Third-Party Performance: Your enrollment success becomes tied to the performance and priorities of an external team. There's limited direct control over messaging consistency, follow-up cadence, or brand representation.
Limited Scalability During Peak Periods: When inquiry volume spikes after a successful campaign or event, agencies often struggle to scale their human resources quickly enough to maintain response times.
What an AI Recruitment Platform Actually Replaces (and What It Doesn't)
Many enrollment leaders express skepticism about AI tools, concerned they'll deliver poor candidate quality or rely too heavily on keywords. The key is understanding that AI platforms replace specific tasks, not relationships:
Tasks AI Handles Brilliantly (The 80%):
Instant, 24/7 Inquiry Response: Engage every lead via phone, email, text, or WhatsApp the moment they show interest—regardless of time zone or day of week.
Systematic Follow-Up & Nurturing: Execute multi-touch automated outreach campaigns that keep leads warm without manual effort.
Lead Qualification at Scale: Automatically filter applicants based on key criteria like program requirements, financing readiness, and language proficiency.
Scheduling & Routing: Book qualified prospects directly into advisor calendars, eliminating the back-and-forth.
Answering FAQs: Provide instant, accurate answers to common questions that don't require human judgment.
Tasks Humans Should Still Own (The 20%):
Complex Advising & Empathy: Handling sensitive conversations about financial aid, personal circumstances, or career guidance.
Strategic Relationship Building: Nurturing connections with key feeder schools, counselors, and educational partners.
Closing High-Intent Students: The final, personalized conversations that seal the enrollment decision.
Handling Edge Cases: Nuanced situations that fall outside standard workflows or require special consideration.
The most effective model positions AI as a co-pilot that handles routine, time-consuming work, allowing human recruiters to function at a higher, more strategic level. This isn't about replacement—it's about augmentation.

Scaling Comparison: A Breakdown for Enrollment Leaders
For enrollment leaders evaluating these models, here's a practical comparison of the factors that impact scalability:
Dimension | Student Recruitment Agency | AI Recruitment Platform |
|---|---|---|
Speed to Lead | Variable (business hours, agent workload) | Instant (24/7/365) |
Cost Predictability | Variable (commission-based, rises with volume) | Predictable (SaaS subscription, marginal cost per lead approaches zero) |
Volume Handling | Limited by human headcount; struggles with spikes | Near-infinite; easily handles spikes from fairs or campaigns |
Messaging Consistency | Varies by agent and firm | 100% consistent; controlled by the institution |
Data Ownership | Owned by the agency; limited visibility | Owned by the institution; full visibility into every interaction |
Personalization | Personalized by hand (1-to-1) | Personalized at scale (using data from CRM) |
International Reach | Strong in specific regions |
The 12-Month Cost and Control Trade-Off
When comparing these models, it's essential to shift thinking from short-term cost to long-term value and institutional control:
Agency Model (The "Rental"):
Lower upfront cost, but you pay "rent" (commissions) in perpetuity
Costs scale directly with success—the more students you enroll, the more you pay
Value is transactional; you build no lasting internal asset
AI Platform Model (The "Asset"):
Higher upfront investment (setup, integration, training), but predictable ongoing cost
Marginal cost per inquiry approaches zero as volume increases
Creates compounding value: every interaction generates data that makes your system smarter
The fundamental question isn't "Which is cheaper today?" but "Which model scales better as we grow?" An agency commission on one student may seem reasonable, but when multiplied across thousands of inquiries, the economics shift dramatically in favor of owned platforms.
The Hybrid Model: The Emerging Best Practice
The most sophisticated institutions aren't choosing one or the other—they're strategically integrating both approaches into a hybrid model:
Use Agencies For:
New market entry where you have no brand presence
Targeting highly specific, niche student populations
Building foundational relationships with key overseas partners
High-touch programs requiring extensive counseling
Use an AI Student Recruitment Platform For:
Universal First Response: Instantly engage 100% of inquiries from all sources (including those generated by agencies)
Always-On Nurturing: Keep your entire prospect pool warm with automated, personalized follow-ups
Reactivating Dormant Leads: Run campaigns to re-engage old inquiries in your CRM, turning sunk costs into new opportunities
Qualification and Routing: Filter leads based on fit criteria before routing to the appropriate human advisor
As Cialfo explains, this approach combines the strengths of both models while minimizing their respective weaknesses. The key is defining clear handoff points between automated systems and human advisors based on lead quality and conversation complexity.
How to Decide Which Model Fits Your Institution
To determine the right approach for your specific situation, consider these key factors:
Inquiry Volume: If you're handling thousands of inquiries annually (especially with sharp seasonal peaks), an AI platform becomes essential for managing scale. Institutions using AI-powered outreach can engage every lead instantly, ensuring no opportunity is missed and maximizing enrollment potential.
Market Diversity: If you recruit from many regions, a hybrid model allows you to use agencies for targeted markets while providing consistent AI coverage globally.
Internal Staffing: If your team is stretched thin, an AI platform acts as a force multiplier, automating the work of several recruiters without adding headcount.
CRM Maturity: If your CRM is primarily a system of record, an AI platform transforms it into a system of action, automatically engaging and updating leads based on interactions.
Budget Predictability: If your finance stakeholders demand predictable spending, the subscription model of an AI platform provides far more stability than variable agency commissions.
Where Havana Fits In Your Enrollment Strategy
Havana is an AI student recruitment platform designed to augment your existing enrollment strategy, whether it includes agencies or not. Rather than replacing human relationships, Havana handles the high-volume, repetitive tasks that overwhelm admissions teams:
AI Agents Across All Channels: Havana works 24/7 via lifelike voice calls, email, SMS, and WhatsApp to engage students on their preferred platform—yielding 70-100% higher response rates.
Built for Enrollment Workflows: From instant lead engagement and qualification to reviving dormant leads and scheduling appointments, Havana handles the entire top-of-funnel journey.
Seamless Integration: It works with your existing team and technology, integrating deeply with CRMs like Salesforce to create a unified, automated system.
The real question isn't whether AI will replace agencies or human advisors—it's how quickly you'll integrate AI to handle the repetitive tasks that drain your team's time and energy. The institutions that thrive will be those that strategically combine human expertise with AI scale to create enrollment systems that are both high-touch and high-efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between a student recruitment agency and an AI platform?
The main difference lies in their operational model and scalability. A student recruitment agency provides human-led, relationship-based services with costs tied to enrollment commissions, while an AI platform automates high-volume communication tasks at a predictable, fixed cost. Agencies excel at providing local market expertise and handling complex, high-touch conversations, but their commission-based model makes scaling expensive. In contrast, an AI platform is designed for scale, handling unlimited inquiries 24/7 with instant response times and allowing human staff to focus on more strategic interactions.
Can AI completely replace human student recruiters?
No, AI is not meant to completely replace human recruiters but rather to act as a co-pilot. The most effective model uses AI to handle high-volume, repetitive tasks like instant inquiry responses, follow-ups, and answering common questions. This frees up human recruiters to focus on activities that require empathy, strategic relationship building, and handling complex student situations—where the human touch is irreplaceable.
When should our institution use a recruitment agency versus an AI platform?
The choice depends on your specific goals, but a hybrid model is often the best practice. Use agencies for their on-the-ground expertise when entering new international markets or for high-touch programs requiring extensive counseling. Simultaneously, use an AI platform to provide a universal, instant first response to 100% of your inquiries, nurture all leads automatically, and qualify them at scale before handing them off to the right human advisor.
How does the cost of an AI platform compare to agency commission fees?
An AI platform typically involves a predictable SaaS subscription fee, making it a scalable asset with a long-term ROI. In contrast, agency costs are variable, commission-based fees that increase directly with enrollment volume, making them less predictable and more expensive at scale. While an AI platform may have an initial setup cost, the marginal cost per inquiry approaches zero as volume grows, offering significant economic advantages.
Why is response speed so important in student recruitment today?
Response speed is critical because research shows that the majority of prospective students enroll with the first institution that responds to their inquiry. Today's students expect instant engagement, and an AI platform ensures a 24/7 instant response across all channels (phone, text, email, WhatsApp). This provides a significant competitive advantage that human-only teams often cannot match, especially outside of business hours.
What specific tasks can an AI recruitment platform automate?
An AI recruitment platform automates top-of-funnel communication tasks, including instant inquiry response, lead qualification, persistent follow-up, answering frequently asked questions, and scheduling appointments. By handling these routine activities, the AI platform ensures every lead is engaged immediately and nurtured consistently, allowing your recruitment team to focus their time and energy on high-intent candidates ready for a human conversation.

See how an AI-powered system can scale your current enrollment model. Schedule a demo to learn how Havana can turn your CRM into your most powerful recruiter.
Summary
With 78% of students enrolling with the first school to respond, the commission-based agency model struggles to scale affordably and handle modern inquiry volumes with the necessary speed.
Agencies excel at high-touch, in-market relationship building, while AI platforms are built to handle repetitive tasks like instant response, lead qualification, and systematic follow-up at a predictable cost.
The most effective strategy is a hybrid model that uses agencies for targeted market entry and deploys an AI platform for universal first response, lead nurturing, and reactivation.
An AI student recruitment platform like Havana augments your team by automating top-of-funnel communication, ensuring no lead is missed and freeing up human advisors to focus on high-intent students.
You've set up your recruitment strategy, spending significant budget on international agencies to drive enrollment. But as your inquiry volume grows, so do your costs. Every new lead, every new market, means more commission fees—with little transparency into what's actually happening in those conversations.
Meanwhile, your competitors are implementing AI platforms that promise to handle unlimited inquiries 24/7, at a fraction of the marginal cost. But you wonder: Can AI really replace the human touch in student recruitment? Or is it just another tech solution that over-promises and under-delivers?
This isn't about replacing humans with robots. It's about making a strategic decision on where to place your budget for maximum leverage, scale, and long-term ROI. Let's break down the real differences between these two approaches to student recruitment.
Why This Comparison Matters More Than Ever
The enrollment landscape has fundamentally changed, making this decision increasingly urgent for institutions:
Response Speed Is No Longer Optional: According to recent research, 78% of prospective students choose to enroll with the first institution that responds to their inquiry. When students can apply to dozens of schools with a few clicks through platforms like The Common App, being first to engage is critical to conversion.
Inquiry Volume Is Overwhelming: The ease of digital applications has created a deluge that exceeds the capacity of most admissions teams. Many institutions report application increases of 30-40% year over year, without corresponding staff increases to manage this volume.
Budget Pressures Are Intense: With dozens of institutions closing in recent years, enrollment efficiency is no longer just about growth—it's about institutional survival. Every dollar spent must demonstrate clear ROI.
Student Expectations Have Shifted: Today's digitally native students expect instant responses across multiple channels (web, SMS, WhatsApp, email). They're comparing your response time not just to other schools, but to every digital experience in their lives.
What Student Recruitment Agencies Do Well
Before weighing alternatives, it's important to acknowledge the legitimate value agencies bring to enrollment strategies:
Market Access & Local Expertise: Agencies provide invaluable on-the-ground knowledge, especially for international recruitment. They understand local educational systems, cultural nuances, and can navigate complex visa processes that are difficult to manage remotely.
Relationship-Driven Outreach: Strong agencies excel at building personal relationships with students, families, and high school counselors. This network effect creates a trust ecosystem that can be difficult to replicate digitally.
High-Touch, Complex Conversations: For programs requiring nuanced explanations or for students with unique circumstances, agencies provide the human guidance that can make the difference in complex decisions.
When Agencies Make the Most Sense: Recruitment agencies are particularly valuable when entering new markets where you have limited brand presence, targeting highly specific student populations, or for programs requiring extensive counseling (like medical schools or specialized graduate programs).
Where Recruitment Agencies Start to Struggle at Scale
Despite their strengths, the traditional agency model encounters significant challenges as institutions aim to grow:
Cost Structures That Punish Volume: Agency fees are typically commission-based, meaning costs rise linearly (or sometimes exponentially) with every enrollment. This model makes scaling expensive and increasingly unpredictable as you grow—the more successful you are, the more you pay.
Limited Visibility Into Conversations: Many institutions describe agency interactions as a "black box." You know leads go in and (hopefully) enrollments come out, but you have limited insight into the conversations happening in between. This prevents you from learning what messaging resonates with prospective students.
Slow Feedback Loops: Many agencies still rely on outdated processes like "spreadsheets and phone calls" for tracking and reporting. As Bullhorn notes, this operational inefficiency creates communication gaps and slows response times—directly contradicting the need for speed in modern recruitment.
Dependency on Third-Party Performance: Your enrollment success becomes tied to the performance and priorities of an external team. There's limited direct control over messaging consistency, follow-up cadence, or brand representation.
Limited Scalability During Peak Periods: When inquiry volume spikes after a successful campaign or event, agencies often struggle to scale their human resources quickly enough to maintain response times.
What an AI Recruitment Platform Actually Replaces (and What It Doesn't)
Many enrollment leaders express skepticism about AI tools, concerned they'll deliver poor candidate quality or rely too heavily on keywords. The key is understanding that AI platforms replace specific tasks, not relationships:
Tasks AI Handles Brilliantly (The 80%):
Instant, 24/7 Inquiry Response: Engage every lead via phone, email, text, or WhatsApp the moment they show interest—regardless of time zone or day of week.
Systematic Follow-Up & Nurturing: Execute multi-touch automated outreach campaigns that keep leads warm without manual effort.
Lead Qualification at Scale: Automatically filter applicants based on key criteria like program requirements, financing readiness, and language proficiency.
Scheduling & Routing: Book qualified prospects directly into advisor calendars, eliminating the back-and-forth.
Answering FAQs: Provide instant, accurate answers to common questions that don't require human judgment.
Tasks Humans Should Still Own (The 20%):
Complex Advising & Empathy: Handling sensitive conversations about financial aid, personal circumstances, or career guidance.
Strategic Relationship Building: Nurturing connections with key feeder schools, counselors, and educational partners.
Closing High-Intent Students: The final, personalized conversations that seal the enrollment decision.
Handling Edge Cases: Nuanced situations that fall outside standard workflows or require special consideration.
The most effective model positions AI as a co-pilot that handles routine, time-consuming work, allowing human recruiters to function at a higher, more strategic level. This isn't about replacement—it's about augmentation.

Scaling Comparison: A Breakdown for Enrollment Leaders
For enrollment leaders evaluating these models, here's a practical comparison of the factors that impact scalability:
Dimension | Student Recruitment Agency | AI Recruitment Platform |
|---|---|---|
Speed to Lead | Variable (business hours, agent workload) | Instant (24/7/365) |
Cost Predictability | Variable (commission-based, rises with volume) | Predictable (SaaS subscription, marginal cost per lead approaches zero) |
Volume Handling | Limited by human headcount; struggles with spikes | Near-infinite; easily handles spikes from fairs or campaigns |
Messaging Consistency | Varies by agent and firm | 100% consistent; controlled by the institution |
Data Ownership | Owned by the agency; limited visibility | Owned by the institution; full visibility into every interaction |
Personalization | Personalized by hand (1-to-1) | Personalized at scale (using data from CRM) |
International Reach | Strong in specific regions |
The 12-Month Cost and Control Trade-Off
When comparing these models, it's essential to shift thinking from short-term cost to long-term value and institutional control:
Agency Model (The "Rental"):
Lower upfront cost, but you pay "rent" (commissions) in perpetuity
Costs scale directly with success—the more students you enroll, the more you pay
Value is transactional; you build no lasting internal asset
AI Platform Model (The "Asset"):
Higher upfront investment (setup, integration, training), but predictable ongoing cost
Marginal cost per inquiry approaches zero as volume increases
Creates compounding value: every interaction generates data that makes your system smarter
The fundamental question isn't "Which is cheaper today?" but "Which model scales better as we grow?" An agency commission on one student may seem reasonable, but when multiplied across thousands of inquiries, the economics shift dramatically in favor of owned platforms.
The Hybrid Model: The Emerging Best Practice
The most sophisticated institutions aren't choosing one or the other—they're strategically integrating both approaches into a hybrid model:
Use Agencies For:
New market entry where you have no brand presence
Targeting highly specific, niche student populations
Building foundational relationships with key overseas partners
High-touch programs requiring extensive counseling
Use an AI Student Recruitment Platform For:
Universal First Response: Instantly engage 100% of inquiries from all sources (including those generated by agencies)
Always-On Nurturing: Keep your entire prospect pool warm with automated, personalized follow-ups
Reactivating Dormant Leads: Run campaigns to re-engage old inquiries in your CRM, turning sunk costs into new opportunities
Qualification and Routing: Filter leads based on fit criteria before routing to the appropriate human advisor
As Cialfo explains, this approach combines the strengths of both models while minimizing their respective weaknesses. The key is defining clear handoff points between automated systems and human advisors based on lead quality and conversation complexity.
How to Decide Which Model Fits Your Institution
To determine the right approach for your specific situation, consider these key factors:
Inquiry Volume: If you're handling thousands of inquiries annually (especially with sharp seasonal peaks), an AI platform becomes essential for managing scale. Institutions using AI-powered outreach can engage every lead instantly, ensuring no opportunity is missed and maximizing enrollment potential.
Market Diversity: If you recruit from many regions, a hybrid model allows you to use agencies for targeted markets while providing consistent AI coverage globally.
Internal Staffing: If your team is stretched thin, an AI platform acts as a force multiplier, automating the work of several recruiters without adding headcount.
CRM Maturity: If your CRM is primarily a system of record, an AI platform transforms it into a system of action, automatically engaging and updating leads based on interactions.
Budget Predictability: If your finance stakeholders demand predictable spending, the subscription model of an AI platform provides far more stability than variable agency commissions.
Where Havana Fits In Your Enrollment Strategy
Havana is an AI student recruitment platform designed to augment your existing enrollment strategy, whether it includes agencies or not. Rather than replacing human relationships, Havana handles the high-volume, repetitive tasks that overwhelm admissions teams:
AI Agents Across All Channels: Havana works 24/7 via lifelike voice calls, email, SMS, and WhatsApp to engage students on their preferred platform—yielding 70-100% higher response rates.
Built for Enrollment Workflows: From instant lead engagement and qualification to reviving dormant leads and scheduling appointments, Havana handles the entire top-of-funnel journey.
Seamless Integration: It works with your existing team and technology, integrating deeply with CRMs like Salesforce to create a unified, automated system.
The real question isn't whether AI will replace agencies or human advisors—it's how quickly you'll integrate AI to handle the repetitive tasks that drain your team's time and energy. The institutions that thrive will be those that strategically combine human expertise with AI scale to create enrollment systems that are both high-touch and high-efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between a student recruitment agency and an AI platform?
The main difference lies in their operational model and scalability. A student recruitment agency provides human-led, relationship-based services with costs tied to enrollment commissions, while an AI platform automates high-volume communication tasks at a predictable, fixed cost. Agencies excel at providing local market expertise and handling complex, high-touch conversations, but their commission-based model makes scaling expensive. In contrast, an AI platform is designed for scale, handling unlimited inquiries 24/7 with instant response times and allowing human staff to focus on more strategic interactions.
Can AI completely replace human student recruiters?
No, AI is not meant to completely replace human recruiters but rather to act as a co-pilot. The most effective model uses AI to handle high-volume, repetitive tasks like instant inquiry responses, follow-ups, and answering common questions. This frees up human recruiters to focus on activities that require empathy, strategic relationship building, and handling complex student situations—where the human touch is irreplaceable.
When should our institution use a recruitment agency versus an AI platform?
The choice depends on your specific goals, but a hybrid model is often the best practice. Use agencies for their on-the-ground expertise when entering new international markets or for high-touch programs requiring extensive counseling. Simultaneously, use an AI platform to provide a universal, instant first response to 100% of your inquiries, nurture all leads automatically, and qualify them at scale before handing them off to the right human advisor.
How does the cost of an AI platform compare to agency commission fees?
An AI platform typically involves a predictable SaaS subscription fee, making it a scalable asset with a long-term ROI. In contrast, agency costs are variable, commission-based fees that increase directly with enrollment volume, making them less predictable and more expensive at scale. While an AI platform may have an initial setup cost, the marginal cost per inquiry approaches zero as volume grows, offering significant economic advantages.
Why is response speed so important in student recruitment today?
Response speed is critical because research shows that the majority of prospective students enroll with the first institution that responds to their inquiry. Today's students expect instant engagement, and an AI platform ensures a 24/7 instant response across all channels (phone, text, email, WhatsApp). This provides a significant competitive advantage that human-only teams often cannot match, especially outside of business hours.
What specific tasks can an AI recruitment platform automate?
An AI recruitment platform automates top-of-funnel communication tasks, including instant inquiry response, lead qualification, persistent follow-up, answering frequently asked questions, and scheduling appointments. By handling these routine activities, the AI platform ensures every lead is engaged immediately and nurtured consistently, allowing your recruitment team to focus their time and energy on high-intent candidates ready for a human conversation.

See how an AI-powered system can scale your current enrollment model. Schedule a demo to learn how Havana can turn your CRM into your most powerful recruiter.
Summary
With 78% of students enrolling with the first school to respond, the commission-based agency model struggles to scale affordably and handle modern inquiry volumes with the necessary speed.
Agencies excel at high-touch, in-market relationship building, while AI platforms are built to handle repetitive tasks like instant response, lead qualification, and systematic follow-up at a predictable cost.
The most effective strategy is a hybrid model that uses agencies for targeted market entry and deploys an AI platform for universal first response, lead nurturing, and reactivation.
An AI student recruitment platform like Havana augments your team by automating top-of-funnel communication, ensuring no lead is missed and freeing up human advisors to focus on high-intent students.
You've set up your recruitment strategy, spending significant budget on international agencies to drive enrollment. But as your inquiry volume grows, so do your costs. Every new lead, every new market, means more commission fees—with little transparency into what's actually happening in those conversations.
Meanwhile, your competitors are implementing AI platforms that promise to handle unlimited inquiries 24/7, at a fraction of the marginal cost. But you wonder: Can AI really replace the human touch in student recruitment? Or is it just another tech solution that over-promises and under-delivers?
This isn't about replacing humans with robots. It's about making a strategic decision on where to place your budget for maximum leverage, scale, and long-term ROI. Let's break down the real differences between these two approaches to student recruitment.
Why This Comparison Matters More Than Ever
The enrollment landscape has fundamentally changed, making this decision increasingly urgent for institutions:
Response Speed Is No Longer Optional: According to recent research, 78% of prospective students choose to enroll with the first institution that responds to their inquiry. When students can apply to dozens of schools with a few clicks through platforms like The Common App, being first to engage is critical to conversion.
Inquiry Volume Is Overwhelming: The ease of digital applications has created a deluge that exceeds the capacity of most admissions teams. Many institutions report application increases of 30-40% year over year, without corresponding staff increases to manage this volume.
Budget Pressures Are Intense: With dozens of institutions closing in recent years, enrollment efficiency is no longer just about growth—it's about institutional survival. Every dollar spent must demonstrate clear ROI.
Student Expectations Have Shifted: Today's digitally native students expect instant responses across multiple channels (web, SMS, WhatsApp, email). They're comparing your response time not just to other schools, but to every digital experience in their lives.
What Student Recruitment Agencies Do Well
Before weighing alternatives, it's important to acknowledge the legitimate value agencies bring to enrollment strategies:
Market Access & Local Expertise: Agencies provide invaluable on-the-ground knowledge, especially for international recruitment. They understand local educational systems, cultural nuances, and can navigate complex visa processes that are difficult to manage remotely.
Relationship-Driven Outreach: Strong agencies excel at building personal relationships with students, families, and high school counselors. This network effect creates a trust ecosystem that can be difficult to replicate digitally.
High-Touch, Complex Conversations: For programs requiring nuanced explanations or for students with unique circumstances, agencies provide the human guidance that can make the difference in complex decisions.
When Agencies Make the Most Sense: Recruitment agencies are particularly valuable when entering new markets where you have limited brand presence, targeting highly specific student populations, or for programs requiring extensive counseling (like medical schools or specialized graduate programs).
Where Recruitment Agencies Start to Struggle at Scale
Despite their strengths, the traditional agency model encounters significant challenges as institutions aim to grow:
Cost Structures That Punish Volume: Agency fees are typically commission-based, meaning costs rise linearly (or sometimes exponentially) with every enrollment. This model makes scaling expensive and increasingly unpredictable as you grow—the more successful you are, the more you pay.
Limited Visibility Into Conversations: Many institutions describe agency interactions as a "black box." You know leads go in and (hopefully) enrollments come out, but you have limited insight into the conversations happening in between. This prevents you from learning what messaging resonates with prospective students.
Slow Feedback Loops: Many agencies still rely on outdated processes like "spreadsheets and phone calls" for tracking and reporting. As Bullhorn notes, this operational inefficiency creates communication gaps and slows response times—directly contradicting the need for speed in modern recruitment.
Dependency on Third-Party Performance: Your enrollment success becomes tied to the performance and priorities of an external team. There's limited direct control over messaging consistency, follow-up cadence, or brand representation.
Limited Scalability During Peak Periods: When inquiry volume spikes after a successful campaign or event, agencies often struggle to scale their human resources quickly enough to maintain response times.
What an AI Recruitment Platform Actually Replaces (and What It Doesn't)
Many enrollment leaders express skepticism about AI tools, concerned they'll deliver poor candidate quality or rely too heavily on keywords. The key is understanding that AI platforms replace specific tasks, not relationships:
Tasks AI Handles Brilliantly (The 80%):
Instant, 24/7 Inquiry Response: Engage every lead via phone, email, text, or WhatsApp the moment they show interest—regardless of time zone or day of week.
Systematic Follow-Up & Nurturing: Execute multi-touch automated outreach campaigns that keep leads warm without manual effort.
Lead Qualification at Scale: Automatically filter applicants based on key criteria like program requirements, financing readiness, and language proficiency.
Scheduling & Routing: Book qualified prospects directly into advisor calendars, eliminating the back-and-forth.
Answering FAQs: Provide instant, accurate answers to common questions that don't require human judgment.
Tasks Humans Should Still Own (The 20%):
Complex Advising & Empathy: Handling sensitive conversations about financial aid, personal circumstances, or career guidance.
Strategic Relationship Building: Nurturing connections with key feeder schools, counselors, and educational partners.
Closing High-Intent Students: The final, personalized conversations that seal the enrollment decision.
Handling Edge Cases: Nuanced situations that fall outside standard workflows or require special consideration.
The most effective model positions AI as a co-pilot that handles routine, time-consuming work, allowing human recruiters to function at a higher, more strategic level. This isn't about replacement—it's about augmentation.

Scaling Comparison: A Breakdown for Enrollment Leaders
For enrollment leaders evaluating these models, here's a practical comparison of the factors that impact scalability:
Dimension | Student Recruitment Agency | AI Recruitment Platform |
|---|---|---|
Speed to Lead | Variable (business hours, agent workload) | Instant (24/7/365) |
Cost Predictability | Variable (commission-based, rises with volume) | Predictable (SaaS subscription, marginal cost per lead approaches zero) |
Volume Handling | Limited by human headcount; struggles with spikes | Near-infinite; easily handles spikes from fairs or campaigns |
Messaging Consistency | Varies by agent and firm | 100% consistent; controlled by the institution |
Data Ownership | Owned by the agency; limited visibility | Owned by the institution; full visibility into every interaction |
Personalization | Personalized by hand (1-to-1) | Personalized at scale (using data from CRM) |
International Reach | Strong in specific regions |
The 12-Month Cost and Control Trade-Off
When comparing these models, it's essential to shift thinking from short-term cost to long-term value and institutional control:
Agency Model (The "Rental"):
Lower upfront cost, but you pay "rent" (commissions) in perpetuity
Costs scale directly with success—the more students you enroll, the more you pay
Value is transactional; you build no lasting internal asset
AI Platform Model (The "Asset"):
Higher upfront investment (setup, integration, training), but predictable ongoing cost
Marginal cost per inquiry approaches zero as volume increases
Creates compounding value: every interaction generates data that makes your system smarter
The fundamental question isn't "Which is cheaper today?" but "Which model scales better as we grow?" An agency commission on one student may seem reasonable, but when multiplied across thousands of inquiries, the economics shift dramatically in favor of owned platforms.
The Hybrid Model: The Emerging Best Practice
The most sophisticated institutions aren't choosing one or the other—they're strategically integrating both approaches into a hybrid model:
Use Agencies For:
New market entry where you have no brand presence
Targeting highly specific, niche student populations
Building foundational relationships with key overseas partners
High-touch programs requiring extensive counseling
Use an AI Student Recruitment Platform For:
Universal First Response: Instantly engage 100% of inquiries from all sources (including those generated by agencies)
Always-On Nurturing: Keep your entire prospect pool warm with automated, personalized follow-ups
Reactivating Dormant Leads: Run campaigns to re-engage old inquiries in your CRM, turning sunk costs into new opportunities
Qualification and Routing: Filter leads based on fit criteria before routing to the appropriate human advisor
As Cialfo explains, this approach combines the strengths of both models while minimizing their respective weaknesses. The key is defining clear handoff points between automated systems and human advisors based on lead quality and conversation complexity.
How to Decide Which Model Fits Your Institution
To determine the right approach for your specific situation, consider these key factors:
Inquiry Volume: If you're handling thousands of inquiries annually (especially with sharp seasonal peaks), an AI platform becomes essential for managing scale. Institutions using AI-powered outreach can engage every lead instantly, ensuring no opportunity is missed and maximizing enrollment potential.
Market Diversity: If you recruit from many regions, a hybrid model allows you to use agencies for targeted markets while providing consistent AI coverage globally.
Internal Staffing: If your team is stretched thin, an AI platform acts as a force multiplier, automating the work of several recruiters without adding headcount.
CRM Maturity: If your CRM is primarily a system of record, an AI platform transforms it into a system of action, automatically engaging and updating leads based on interactions.
Budget Predictability: If your finance stakeholders demand predictable spending, the subscription model of an AI platform provides far more stability than variable agency commissions.
Where Havana Fits In Your Enrollment Strategy
Havana is an AI student recruitment platform designed to augment your existing enrollment strategy, whether it includes agencies or not. Rather than replacing human relationships, Havana handles the high-volume, repetitive tasks that overwhelm admissions teams:
AI Agents Across All Channels: Havana works 24/7 via lifelike voice calls, email, SMS, and WhatsApp to engage students on their preferred platform—yielding 70-100% higher response rates.
Built for Enrollment Workflows: From instant lead engagement and qualification to reviving dormant leads and scheduling appointments, Havana handles the entire top-of-funnel journey.
Seamless Integration: It works with your existing team and technology, integrating deeply with CRMs like Salesforce to create a unified, automated system.
The real question isn't whether AI will replace agencies or human advisors—it's how quickly you'll integrate AI to handle the repetitive tasks that drain your team's time and energy. The institutions that thrive will be those that strategically combine human expertise with AI scale to create enrollment systems that are both high-touch and high-efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between a student recruitment agency and an AI platform?
The main difference lies in their operational model and scalability. A student recruitment agency provides human-led, relationship-based services with costs tied to enrollment commissions, while an AI platform automates high-volume communication tasks at a predictable, fixed cost. Agencies excel at providing local market expertise and handling complex, high-touch conversations, but their commission-based model makes scaling expensive. In contrast, an AI platform is designed for scale, handling unlimited inquiries 24/7 with instant response times and allowing human staff to focus on more strategic interactions.
Can AI completely replace human student recruiters?
No, AI is not meant to completely replace human recruiters but rather to act as a co-pilot. The most effective model uses AI to handle high-volume, repetitive tasks like instant inquiry responses, follow-ups, and answering common questions. This frees up human recruiters to focus on activities that require empathy, strategic relationship building, and handling complex student situations—where the human touch is irreplaceable.
When should our institution use a recruitment agency versus an AI platform?
The choice depends on your specific goals, but a hybrid model is often the best practice. Use agencies for their on-the-ground expertise when entering new international markets or for high-touch programs requiring extensive counseling. Simultaneously, use an AI platform to provide a universal, instant first response to 100% of your inquiries, nurture all leads automatically, and qualify them at scale before handing them off to the right human advisor.
How does the cost of an AI platform compare to agency commission fees?
An AI platform typically involves a predictable SaaS subscription fee, making it a scalable asset with a long-term ROI. In contrast, agency costs are variable, commission-based fees that increase directly with enrollment volume, making them less predictable and more expensive at scale. While an AI platform may have an initial setup cost, the marginal cost per inquiry approaches zero as volume grows, offering significant economic advantages.
Why is response speed so important in student recruitment today?
Response speed is critical because research shows that the majority of prospective students enroll with the first institution that responds to their inquiry. Today's students expect instant engagement, and an AI platform ensures a 24/7 instant response across all channels (phone, text, email, WhatsApp). This provides a significant competitive advantage that human-only teams often cannot match, especially outside of business hours.
What specific tasks can an AI recruitment platform automate?
An AI recruitment platform automates top-of-funnel communication tasks, including instant inquiry response, lead qualification, persistent follow-up, answering frequently asked questions, and scheduling appointments. By handling these routine activities, the AI platform ensures every lead is engaged immediately and nurtured consistently, allowing your recruitment team to focus their time and energy on high-intent candidates ready for a human conversation.

See how an AI-powered system can scale your current enrollment model. Schedule a demo to learn how Havana can turn your CRM into your most powerful recruiter.
Summary
With 78% of students enrolling with the first school to respond, the commission-based agency model struggles to scale affordably and handle modern inquiry volumes with the necessary speed.
Agencies excel at high-touch, in-market relationship building, while AI platforms are built to handle repetitive tasks like instant response, lead qualification, and systematic follow-up at a predictable cost.
The most effective strategy is a hybrid model that uses agencies for targeted market entry and deploys an AI platform for universal first response, lead nurturing, and reactivation.
An AI student recruitment platform like Havana augments your team by automating top-of-funnel communication, ensuring no lead is missed and freeing up human advisors to focus on high-intent students.
You've set up your recruitment strategy, spending significant budget on international agencies to drive enrollment. But as your inquiry volume grows, so do your costs. Every new lead, every new market, means more commission fees—with little transparency into what's actually happening in those conversations.
Meanwhile, your competitors are implementing AI platforms that promise to handle unlimited inquiries 24/7, at a fraction of the marginal cost. But you wonder: Can AI really replace the human touch in student recruitment? Or is it just another tech solution that over-promises and under-delivers?
This isn't about replacing humans with robots. It's about making a strategic decision on where to place your budget for maximum leverage, scale, and long-term ROI. Let's break down the real differences between these two approaches to student recruitment.
Why This Comparison Matters More Than Ever
The enrollment landscape has fundamentally changed, making this decision increasingly urgent for institutions:
Response Speed Is No Longer Optional: According to recent research, 78% of prospective students choose to enroll with the first institution that responds to their inquiry. When students can apply to dozens of schools with a few clicks through platforms like The Common App, being first to engage is critical to conversion.
Inquiry Volume Is Overwhelming: The ease of digital applications has created a deluge that exceeds the capacity of most admissions teams. Many institutions report application increases of 30-40% year over year, without corresponding staff increases to manage this volume.
Budget Pressures Are Intense: With dozens of institutions closing in recent years, enrollment efficiency is no longer just about growth—it's about institutional survival. Every dollar spent must demonstrate clear ROI.
Student Expectations Have Shifted: Today's digitally native students expect instant responses across multiple channels (web, SMS, WhatsApp, email). They're comparing your response time not just to other schools, but to every digital experience in their lives.
What Student Recruitment Agencies Do Well
Before weighing alternatives, it's important to acknowledge the legitimate value agencies bring to enrollment strategies:
Market Access & Local Expertise: Agencies provide invaluable on-the-ground knowledge, especially for international recruitment. They understand local educational systems, cultural nuances, and can navigate complex visa processes that are difficult to manage remotely.
Relationship-Driven Outreach: Strong agencies excel at building personal relationships with students, families, and high school counselors. This network effect creates a trust ecosystem that can be difficult to replicate digitally.
High-Touch, Complex Conversations: For programs requiring nuanced explanations or for students with unique circumstances, agencies provide the human guidance that can make the difference in complex decisions.
When Agencies Make the Most Sense: Recruitment agencies are particularly valuable when entering new markets where you have limited brand presence, targeting highly specific student populations, or for programs requiring extensive counseling (like medical schools or specialized graduate programs).
Where Recruitment Agencies Start to Struggle at Scale
Despite their strengths, the traditional agency model encounters significant challenges as institutions aim to grow:
Cost Structures That Punish Volume: Agency fees are typically commission-based, meaning costs rise linearly (or sometimes exponentially) with every enrollment. This model makes scaling expensive and increasingly unpredictable as you grow—the more successful you are, the more you pay.
Limited Visibility Into Conversations: Many institutions describe agency interactions as a "black box." You know leads go in and (hopefully) enrollments come out, but you have limited insight into the conversations happening in between. This prevents you from learning what messaging resonates with prospective students.
Slow Feedback Loops: Many agencies still rely on outdated processes like "spreadsheets and phone calls" for tracking and reporting. As Bullhorn notes, this operational inefficiency creates communication gaps and slows response times—directly contradicting the need for speed in modern recruitment.
Dependency on Third-Party Performance: Your enrollment success becomes tied to the performance and priorities of an external team. There's limited direct control over messaging consistency, follow-up cadence, or brand representation.
Limited Scalability During Peak Periods: When inquiry volume spikes after a successful campaign or event, agencies often struggle to scale their human resources quickly enough to maintain response times.
What an AI Recruitment Platform Actually Replaces (and What It Doesn't)
Many enrollment leaders express skepticism about AI tools, concerned they'll deliver poor candidate quality or rely too heavily on keywords. The key is understanding that AI platforms replace specific tasks, not relationships:
Tasks AI Handles Brilliantly (The 80%):
Instant, 24/7 Inquiry Response: Engage every lead via phone, email, text, or WhatsApp the moment they show interest—regardless of time zone or day of week.
Systematic Follow-Up & Nurturing: Execute multi-touch automated outreach campaigns that keep leads warm without manual effort.
Lead Qualification at Scale: Automatically filter applicants based on key criteria like program requirements, financing readiness, and language proficiency.
Scheduling & Routing: Book qualified prospects directly into advisor calendars, eliminating the back-and-forth.
Answering FAQs: Provide instant, accurate answers to common questions that don't require human judgment.
Tasks Humans Should Still Own (The 20%):
Complex Advising & Empathy: Handling sensitive conversations about financial aid, personal circumstances, or career guidance.
Strategic Relationship Building: Nurturing connections with key feeder schools, counselors, and educational partners.
Closing High-Intent Students: The final, personalized conversations that seal the enrollment decision.
Handling Edge Cases: Nuanced situations that fall outside standard workflows or require special consideration.
The most effective model positions AI as a co-pilot that handles routine, time-consuming work, allowing human recruiters to function at a higher, more strategic level. This isn't about replacement—it's about augmentation.

Scaling Comparison: A Breakdown for Enrollment Leaders
For enrollment leaders evaluating these models, here's a practical comparison of the factors that impact scalability:
Dimension | Student Recruitment Agency | AI Recruitment Platform |
|---|---|---|
Speed to Lead | Variable (business hours, agent workload) | Instant (24/7/365) |
Cost Predictability | Variable (commission-based, rises with volume) | Predictable (SaaS subscription, marginal cost per lead approaches zero) |
Volume Handling | Limited by human headcount; struggles with spikes | Near-infinite; easily handles spikes from fairs or campaigns |
Messaging Consistency | Varies by agent and firm | 100% consistent; controlled by the institution |
Data Ownership | Owned by the agency; limited visibility | Owned by the institution; full visibility into every interaction |
Personalization | Personalized by hand (1-to-1) | Personalized at scale (using data from CRM) |
International Reach | Strong in specific regions |
The 12-Month Cost and Control Trade-Off
When comparing these models, it's essential to shift thinking from short-term cost to long-term value and institutional control:
Agency Model (The "Rental"):
Lower upfront cost, but you pay "rent" (commissions) in perpetuity
Costs scale directly with success—the more students you enroll, the more you pay
Value is transactional; you build no lasting internal asset
AI Platform Model (The "Asset"):
Higher upfront investment (setup, integration, training), but predictable ongoing cost
Marginal cost per inquiry approaches zero as volume increases
Creates compounding value: every interaction generates data that makes your system smarter
The fundamental question isn't "Which is cheaper today?" but "Which model scales better as we grow?" An agency commission on one student may seem reasonable, but when multiplied across thousands of inquiries, the economics shift dramatically in favor of owned platforms.
The Hybrid Model: The Emerging Best Practice
The most sophisticated institutions aren't choosing one or the other—they're strategically integrating both approaches into a hybrid model:
Use Agencies For:
New market entry where you have no brand presence
Targeting highly specific, niche student populations
Building foundational relationships with key overseas partners
High-touch programs requiring extensive counseling
Use an AI Student Recruitment Platform For:
Universal First Response: Instantly engage 100% of inquiries from all sources (including those generated by agencies)
Always-On Nurturing: Keep your entire prospect pool warm with automated, personalized follow-ups
Reactivating Dormant Leads: Run campaigns to re-engage old inquiries in your CRM, turning sunk costs into new opportunities
Qualification and Routing: Filter leads based on fit criteria before routing to the appropriate human advisor
As Cialfo explains, this approach combines the strengths of both models while minimizing their respective weaknesses. The key is defining clear handoff points between automated systems and human advisors based on lead quality and conversation complexity.
How to Decide Which Model Fits Your Institution
To determine the right approach for your specific situation, consider these key factors:
Inquiry Volume: If you're handling thousands of inquiries annually (especially with sharp seasonal peaks), an AI platform becomes essential for managing scale. Institutions using AI-powered outreach can engage every lead instantly, ensuring no opportunity is missed and maximizing enrollment potential.
Market Diversity: If you recruit from many regions, a hybrid model allows you to use agencies for targeted markets while providing consistent AI coverage globally.
Internal Staffing: If your team is stretched thin, an AI platform acts as a force multiplier, automating the work of several recruiters without adding headcount.
CRM Maturity: If your CRM is primarily a system of record, an AI platform transforms it into a system of action, automatically engaging and updating leads based on interactions.
Budget Predictability: If your finance stakeholders demand predictable spending, the subscription model of an AI platform provides far more stability than variable agency commissions.
Where Havana Fits In Your Enrollment Strategy
Havana is an AI student recruitment platform designed to augment your existing enrollment strategy, whether it includes agencies or not. Rather than replacing human relationships, Havana handles the high-volume, repetitive tasks that overwhelm admissions teams:
AI Agents Across All Channels: Havana works 24/7 via lifelike voice calls, email, SMS, and WhatsApp to engage students on their preferred platform—yielding 70-100% higher response rates.
Built for Enrollment Workflows: From instant lead engagement and qualification to reviving dormant leads and scheduling appointments, Havana handles the entire top-of-funnel journey.
Seamless Integration: It works with your existing team and technology, integrating deeply with CRMs like Salesforce to create a unified, automated system.
The real question isn't whether AI will replace agencies or human advisors—it's how quickly you'll integrate AI to handle the repetitive tasks that drain your team's time and energy. The institutions that thrive will be those that strategically combine human expertise with AI scale to create enrollment systems that are both high-touch and high-efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between a student recruitment agency and an AI platform?
The main difference lies in their operational model and scalability. A student recruitment agency provides human-led, relationship-based services with costs tied to enrollment commissions, while an AI platform automates high-volume communication tasks at a predictable, fixed cost. Agencies excel at providing local market expertise and handling complex, high-touch conversations, but their commission-based model makes scaling expensive. In contrast, an AI platform is designed for scale, handling unlimited inquiries 24/7 with instant response times and allowing human staff to focus on more strategic interactions.
Can AI completely replace human student recruiters?
No, AI is not meant to completely replace human recruiters but rather to act as a co-pilot. The most effective model uses AI to handle high-volume, repetitive tasks like instant inquiry responses, follow-ups, and answering common questions. This frees up human recruiters to focus on activities that require empathy, strategic relationship building, and handling complex student situations—where the human touch is irreplaceable.
When should our institution use a recruitment agency versus an AI platform?
The choice depends on your specific goals, but a hybrid model is often the best practice. Use agencies for their on-the-ground expertise when entering new international markets or for high-touch programs requiring extensive counseling. Simultaneously, use an AI platform to provide a universal, instant first response to 100% of your inquiries, nurture all leads automatically, and qualify them at scale before handing them off to the right human advisor.
How does the cost of an AI platform compare to agency commission fees?
An AI platform typically involves a predictable SaaS subscription fee, making it a scalable asset with a long-term ROI. In contrast, agency costs are variable, commission-based fees that increase directly with enrollment volume, making them less predictable and more expensive at scale. While an AI platform may have an initial setup cost, the marginal cost per inquiry approaches zero as volume grows, offering significant economic advantages.
Why is response speed so important in student recruitment today?
Response speed is critical because research shows that the majority of prospective students enroll with the first institution that responds to their inquiry. Today's students expect instant engagement, and an AI platform ensures a 24/7 instant response across all channels (phone, text, email, WhatsApp). This provides a significant competitive advantage that human-only teams often cannot match, especially outside of business hours.
What specific tasks can an AI recruitment platform automate?
An AI recruitment platform automates top-of-funnel communication tasks, including instant inquiry response, lead qualification, persistent follow-up, answering frequently asked questions, and scheduling appointments. By handling these routine activities, the AI platform ensures every lead is engaged immediately and nurtured consistently, allowing your recruitment team to focus their time and energy on high-intent candidates ready for a human conversation.

See how an AI-powered system can scale your current enrollment model. Schedule a demo to learn how Havana can turn your CRM into your most powerful recruiter.
